Nonprofit Boards in Australia: a distinctive governance approach
نویسندگان
چکیده
This article reports the findings into patterns of governance on nonprofit boards in Australia. The research surveys 118 boards, upon which serve a total of 1405 directors. The findings indicate that nonprofit boards can mimic some aspects of a shareholder approach to governance. But nonprofit boards, in the main, indicate priorities and activities of a stakeholder approach to governance. The features of `isomorphism' that arise largely stem from legislative requirements in corporate governance. Generally, nonprofit directors are influenced by agenda and motivations that can be differentiated from the influences upon director activity in the corporate sector. The study indicates that nonprofit boards prize knowledge and loyalty to the sector when considering board composition. The survey suggests nonprofits `̀ compensate'' for the demands placed upon them about fiduciary duty and due diligence responsibilities with the diverse intellectual expertise of non-executive directors. Nonprofit boards possess greater diversity than boards in the corporate sector; they include more women as directors than corporate boards and they include a greater proportion of directors from minority groups. While strategic issues feature significantly as a task of the nonprofit board, they distinguish themselves from their corporate counterparts by engaging in operational management. The findings indicate that, in the main, directors on nonprofit boards deliberate and operate in ways distinctive from their corporate counterparts. Such findings offer a contribution to the reform of Corporations Law in other countries and the likely consequence on boards outside the corporate sector.
منابع مشابه
PROSPECTING FOR PRACTICAL METHODOLOGIES TO EXAMINE LINKS BETWEEN GOVERNING BOARDS’ PERFORMANCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Boards and Beyond: Understanding the Changing Realities of Nonprofit Organizational Governance
متن کامل
Moving to Transformational Inclusivity and Board Diversity
This paper explores the dynamics of diversity and inclusivity in the context of boards of directors in the non-profit sector. Starting with a review of the current state of diversity research the paper considers functional and social approaches to inclusion within boards, and then moves to address the potential for transformational inclusivity. Using a grounded theory approach the paper present...
متن کاملGovernance of quality of care: a qualitative study of health service boards in Victoria, Australia
OBJECTIVES To describe the engagement of health service boards with quality-of-care issues and to identify factors that influence boards' activities in this area. METHODS We conducted semistructured interviews with 35 board members and executives from 13 public health services in Victoria, Australia. Interviews focused on the role currently played by boards in overseeing quality of care. We a...
متن کاملA ! HEALTH LAW REPORTER BNA ’ s
BY MICHAEL W. PEREGRINE AND JAMES R. SCHWARTZ T he year 2009 witnessed an extraordinary series of developments in nonprofit corporate and charitable trust law as they affect the governance and operation of hospitals and health care systems. This is consistent with a decade-long trend that has made corporate law and governance key legal feasibility considerations for nonprofit organizations. The...
متن کاملThe Governance Self- Assessment Checklist An Instrument for Assessing Board Effectiveness
This article describes the development and validation of the Governance Self-Assessment Checklist (GSAC). The GSAC was designed to assist boards of directors of nonprofit and public sector organizations to identify strengths and weaknesses in the governance of their organizations, educate board members about the essentials of good governance, and improve their governance practices. The instrume...
متن کامل